This history item belongs to Formica foetida Linnaeus, 1758

Its current taxon owner(s) is Neoponera foetida

Senior synonym of Neoponera lobata: Retzius, 1783: 75; Olivier, 1792: 502; Latreille, 1802a: 206; Roger, 1863b: 18; Dalla Torre, 1893: 33; Kempf, 1972b: 162; Bolton, 1995b: 305; MacKay & MacKay, 2010: 332; Fernandes et al., 2014: 149. 

Senior synonym of {prott 168703}: {ref 128038}: 75; {ref 127622}: 502; {ref 126800}: 206; {ref 128094}: 18; {ref 124002}: 33; {ref 126357}: 162; {ref 122860}: 305; {ref 131785}: 332; {ref 142549}: 149.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2020-12-24
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Formica foetida Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Neoponera foetida (Linnaeus, 1758)
Neoponera foetida Species Valid
Pachycondyla foetida Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Neoponera foetida (Linnaeus, 1758)
Other history items belonging to Formica foetida
#263373 Roger, 1860: 312 (w.)
#263374 Combination in Ponera: Smith, 1858a: 95.
#287305 Combination in Pachycondyla: Roger, 1863b: 18; Brown, 1995a: 305.
#287304 Combination in Neoponera: Emery, 1901b: 47; Schmidt & Shattuck, 2014: 151.
#263377 Status as species: Linnaeus, 1767: 965; De Geer, 1773: 601; Retzius, 1783: 75; Gmelin, 1790: 2804; Christ, 1791: 516; Olivier, 1792: 502; Latreille, 1802a: 206; Roger, 1860: 312 (redescription); Mayr, 1863a: 448; Mayr, 1884: 32; Emery, 1890b: 74 (in key); Emery, 1890c: 43; Dalla Torre, 1893: 33; Emery, 1894l: 49; Forel, 1899b: 11; Emery, 1911e: 72; Forel, 1914e: 10; Kempf, 1960e: 391; Kempf, 1972b: 162; Bolton, 1995b: 305; Mackay et al., 2008: 192; MacKay & MacKay, 2010: 332 (redescription); Fernandes et al., 2014: 149; Bezděčková et al., 2015: 123; Feitosa, 2015c: 99; Fernández & Guerrero, 2019: 534.
#263376 (selected) Senior synonym of Neoponera lobata: Retzius, 1783: 75; Olivier, 1792: 502; Latreille, 1802a: 206; Roger, 1863b: 18; Dalla Torre, 1893: 33; Kempf, 1972b: 162; Bolton, 1995b: 305; MacKay & MacKay, 2010: 332; Fernandes et al., 2014: 149.