Closed issue: Create missing nested references
We want to map all 'scientific claims' to a single Reference record.
Since there are 200+ "Brown, in Bolton, 1995b", I added a column for "Replace with reference ID" so we can replace them by script once we have the ID of the target NestedReference record. This only works if all hardcoded nested references should be replaced with the same reference, so we need to confirm that that's the case too (edit this issue to add IDs).
- All results here: ", in {ref"
| Missing nested reference | Replace with reference ID | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
| Brown, in Bolton, 1994 | Brown, 1994 | Yes |
| Brown, in Bolton, 1995b | Brown, 1995a | Yes |
| Brown, in Borgmeier, 1957a | Brown, 1957k | Yes |
| Brown, in Linsley & Usinger, 1966 | Brown, 1966a | Yes |
| Brown, in Ettershank, 1966 | Brown, 1966d | Yes |
| Brown, in Wilson, 1958c | Brown, 1958k | Yes |
| Emery, in Dalla Torre, 1893 | Emery, 1893m | Yes |
| Emery, in Mayr, 1895 | Emery, 1895o | Yes |
| Emery, in Forel, 1902i | Emery, 1902d | Yes |
| Fernández, in Heterick, 2006 | Fernández, 2006b | Yes |
| Shattuck, in Bolton, 2000 | Shattuck, 2000 | Yes |
| Shattuck, in Heterick & Shattuck, 2011 | Shattuck, 2011 | Yes |
| Shuckard, in Swainson & Shuckard, 1840 | Shuckard, 1840e | Yes |
5 comments
Brian Fisher commented over 3 years ago:
@Fredrik Palmkron I think this is what we want; I am glad there are not that many that need to be created.
Fredrik Palmkron commented over 3 years ago:
There are a couple more not in the table, but not too many.
Brian Fisher commented over 3 years ago:
@Fredrik Palmkron The references above are ready to fix via script
Fredrik Palmkron commented over 3 years ago:
Done, great work, closing.
GitHub: https://github.com/calacademy-research/antcat/issues/1170
Fredrik Palmkron commented over 3 years ago: show raw@user6 This is what we want, right? If we want to show "Brown, in Bolton, 1995b", then we can come up with something new, like always expanding `ref` tags of nested references to display with the "in" (except for author citations), or a new tag type like `{refin 123}`.
@Brian Fisher This is what we want, right?
If we want to show "Brown, in Bolton, 1995b", then we can come up with something new, like always expanding
reftags of nested references to display with the "in" (except for author citations), or a new tag type like{refin 123}.