This history item belongs to Formica bicolor Fabricius, 1793

Its current taxon owner(s) is Cataglyphis bicolor

Status as species: Latreille, 1802a: 123; Fabricius, 1804: 398; Lucas, 1849: 302; Smith, 1858a: 31; Emery & Forel, 1879: 449; Emery, 1906f: 58; Mayr, 1907a: 389; Forel, 1907h: 15; Santschi, 1908: 518; Santschi, 1910f: 234; Karavaiev, 1911a: 39; Karavaiev, 1911b: 10; Karavaiev, 1912b: 590; Emery, 1915e: 22; Viehmeyer, 1923: 92; Müller, 1923b: 149; Karavaiev, 1924: 306; Emery, 1925d: 264; Menozzi, 1927g: 380; Santschi, 1929b: 41; Finzi, 1930b: 16; Finzi, 1930c: 24; Karavaiev, 1932: 250; Menozzi, 1933b: 87 (in key); Menozzi, 1934: 166; Finzi, 1936: 192; Santschi, 1936c: 210; Finzi, 1939a: 160; Finzi, 1940: 165; Donisthorpe, 1942a: 33; Bernard, 1945b: 137; Athias-Henriot, 1947: 249; Donisthorpe, 1947f: 111; Donisthorpe, 1950e: 1065; Bernard, 1953a: 198; Cagniant, 1964: 93; Cagniant, 1966b: 281; Cagniant, 1968a: 145; Cagniant, 1970c: 30; Bernard, 1971: 8; Hamann & Klemm, 1976: 674; Agosti, 1990b: 1486; Wehner et al., 1994: 168; Bolton, 1995b: 134; Cagniant, 2006: 194; Cagniant, 2009: 49; Legakis, 2011: 34; Borowiec & Salata, 2012: 486; Kiran & Karaman, 2012: 9; Borowiec, 2014: 52 (see note in bibliography); Tohmé & Tohmé, 2014: 139; Madl, 2019: 14. 

Status as species: {ref 126800}: 123; {ref 124870}: 398; {ref 126976}: 302; {ref 128685}: 31; {ref 124778}: 449; {ref 124675}: 58; {ref 127251}: 389; {ref 125175}: 15; {ref 128245}: 518; {ref 128254}: 234; {ref 126237}: 39; {ref 126238}: 10; {ref 126240}: 590; {ref 124726}: 22; {ref 129518}: 92; {ref 127478}: 149; {ref 126232}: 306; {ref 124775}: 264; {ref 127339}: 380; {ref 128381}: 41; {ref 124931}: 16; {ref 124932}: 24; {ref 126233}: 250; {ref 127374}: 87 (in key); {ref 127312}: 166; {ref 124917}: 192; {ref 128427}: 210; {ref 124936}: 160; {ref 124939}: 165; {ref 124314}: 33; {ref 122627}: 137; {ref 143310}: 249; {ref 124355}: 111; {ref 124377}: 1065; {ref 122636}: 198; {ref 123447}: 93; {ref 123449}: 281; {ref 123455}: 145; {ref 123464}: 30; {ref 122622}: 8; {ref 125747}: 674; {ref 122142}: 1486; {ref 129772}: 168; {ref 122860}: 134; {ref 132841}: 194; {ref 130875}: 49; {ref 132927}: 34; {ref 142313}: 486; {ref 142245}: 9; {ref 142632}: 52 (see note in bibliography); {ref 143644}: 139; {ref 143304}: 14.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2020-06-10
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Cataglyphis bicolor Species Valid
Cataglyphis viatica bicolor Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis bicolor (Fabricius, 1793)
Formica bicolor Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis bicolor (Fabricius, 1793)
Myrmecocystus bicolor Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis bicolor (Fabricius, 1793)
Myrmecocystus viaticus bicolor Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis bicolor (Fabricius, 1793)
Other history items belonging to Formica bicolor
#280738 [Misspelled as biceler by Menozzi, 1929f: 128.]
#292934 [Misspelled as bicolora by Borowiec & Salata, 2012: 486.]
#249967 Athias-Henriot, 1947: 249 (l.); Wheeler & Wheeler, 1980: 538 (l.).
#249968 Combination in Myrmecocystus: Emery & Forel, 1879: 449.
#280739 Combination in Myrmecocystus (Cataglyphis): Santschi, 1910f: 234.
#280740 Combination in Cataglyphis: Roger, 1863b: 12; Mayr, 1863a: 402; Emery, 1912f: 98; Emery, 1915e: 22.
#280741 Combination in Cataglyphis (Cataglyphis): Santschi, 1929b: 41.
#249969 Junior synonym of Cataglyphis viatica: Nylander, 1856b: 59; Smith, 1858a: 9; Smith, 1861a: 32; Mayr, 1863a: 402; Roger, 1863b: 12; Emery & Forel, 1879: 449; Nasonov, 1889: 14; Dalla Torre, 1893: 218.
#249971 Subspecies of Cataglyphis viatica: Forel, 1907h: 15; Forel, 1908b: 14; Forel, 1909k: 386; Forel, 1910c: 266; Forel, 1910f: 450; Wheeler & Mann, 1916: 173; Stitz, 1917: 348; Wheeler, 1922: 944.
#249972 (selected) Status as species: Latreille, 1802a: 123; Fabricius, 1804: 398; Lucas, 1849: 302; Smith, 1858a: 31; Emery & Forel, 1879: 449; Emery, 1906f: 58; Mayr, 1907a: 389; Forel, 1907h: 15; Santschi, 1908: 518; Santschi, 1910f: 234; Karavaiev, 1911a: 39; Karavaiev, 1911b: 10; Karavaiev, 1912b: 590; Emery, 1915e: 22; Viehmeyer, 1923: 92; Müller, 1923b: 149; Karavaiev, 1924: 306; Emery, 1925d: 264; Menozzi, 1927g: 380; Santschi, 1929b: 41; Finzi, 1930b: 16; Finzi, 1930c: 24; Karavaiev, 1932: 250; Menozzi, 1933b: 87 (in key); Menozzi, 1934: 166; Finzi, 1936: 192; Santschi, 1936c: 210; Finzi, 1939a: 160; Finzi, 1940: 165; Donisthorpe, 1942a: 33; Bernard, 1945b: 137; Athias-Henriot, 1947: 249; Donisthorpe, 1947f: 111; Donisthorpe, 1950e: 1065; Bernard, 1953a: 198; Cagniant, 1964: 93; Cagniant, 1966b: 281; Cagniant, 1968a: 145; Cagniant, 1970c: 30; Bernard, 1971: 8; Hamann & Klemm, 1976: 674; Agosti, 1990b: 1486; Wehner et al., 1994: 168; Bolton, 1995b: 134; Cagniant, 2006: 194; Cagniant, 2009: 49; Legakis, 2011: 34; Borowiec & Salata, 2012: 486; Kiran & Karaman, 2012: 9; Borowiec, 2014: 52 (see note in bibliography); Tohmé & Tohmé, 2014: 139; Madl, 2019: 14.
#249973 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis fairmairei: Santschi, 1929b: 41; Agosti, 1990b: 1487; Bolton, 1995b: 134.
#280742 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis megalocola: Mayr, 1855: 382; Santschi, 1929b: 41; Agosti, 1990b: 1486; Bolton, 1995b: 134.
#280743 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis albicans rotundinodis: Santschi, 1929b: 41; Agosti, 1990b: 1487; Bolton, 1995b: 134.