This history item belongs to Formica irritans Smith, 1857

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus irritans

Subspecies of Camponotus maculatus: Forel, 1892k: 242; Emery, 1896j: 370 (in list); Mayr, 1897: 432; Forel, 1901c: 27; Dahl, 1901: 17 (in key); Forel, 1909i: 229; Forel, 1911a: 48; Forel, 1911b: 210; Forel, 1912a: 75; Forel, 1912o: 62; Forel, 1913l: 125; Forel, 1915a: 37; Wheeler, 1919f: 108; Wheeler, 1924c: 253; Teranishi, 1940: 60 (first entry).


Subspecies of {tax 433086}: {ref 125041}: 242; {ref 124614}: 370 (in list); {ref 127204}: 432; {ref 125107}: 27; {ref 123999}: 17 (in key); {ref 125197}: 229; {ref 125209}: 48; {ref 125210}: 210; {ref 133009}: 75; {ref 125237}: 62; {ref 125249}: 125; {ref 125257}: 37; {ref 130136}: 108; {ref 130172}: 253; {ref 129229}: 60 (first entry).
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2020-09-23
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus irritans Species Valid
Camponotus maculatus irritans Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus irritans (Smith, 1857)
Formica irritans Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus irritans (Smith, 1857)
Other history items belonging to Formica irritans
#247392 Forel, 1913l: 125 (q.); Wheeler, 1924c: 253 (q.m.).
#247393 Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 3.
#284900 Combination in Camponotus (Myrmoturba): Forel, 1913l: 125.
#284899 Combination in Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex): Emery, 1925d: 93.
#247394 (selected) Subspecies of Camponotus maculatus: Forel, 1892k: 242; Emery, 1896j: 370 (in list); Mayr, 1897: 432; Forel, 1901c: 27; Dahl, 1901: 17 (in key); Forel, 1909i: 229; Forel, 1911a: 48; Forel, 1911b: 210; Forel, 1912a: 75; Forel, 1912o: 62; Forel, 1913l: 125; Forel, 1915a: 37; Wheeler, 1919f: 108; Wheeler, 1924c: 253; Teranishi, 1940: 60 (first entry).
#247395 Status as species: Smith, 1858a: 22; Mayr, 1863a: 416; Roger, 1863b: 3; Smith, 1871a: 304; Mayr, 1879: 646; Forel, 1885b: 176; Emery, 1887a: 217; Dalla Torre, 1893: 236; Emery, 1893g: 196; Bingham, 1903: 353; Forel, 1905f: 26; Wheeler, 1909d: 337; Yano, 1910a: 422; Emery, 1920b: 255; Emery, 1920d: 7, 12 (in key); Santschi, 1924c: 114; Emery, 1925d: 93; Wheeler, 1929h: 57; Karavaiev, 1929e: 236; Stärcke, 1930: 376; Donisthorpe, 1932c: 444; Karavaiev, 1933a: 316; Wheeler, 1935g: 39; Wheeler, 1937a: 24; Teranishi, 1940: 60 (second entry); Chapman & Capco, 1951: 246; Bolton, 1995b: 105; Lin & Wu, 2003: 61; Karmaly & Narendran, 2006: 73; Terayama, 2009: 216; Mohanraj et al., 2010: 6; Pfeiffer et al., 2011: 37; Ran & Zhou, 2011: 68; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 28; McArthur, 2012: 209; Bharti et al., 2016: 24; Dias et al., 2020: 33; Khachonpisitsak et al., 2020: 42; Wang et al., 2022: 42.
#247396 Senior synonym of Camponotus agnatus: Bingham, 1903: 353; Emery, 1925d: 93; Bolton, 1995b: 105; Karmaly & Narendran, 2006: 73.
#247397 [Note: Smith, 1857a: 58, and Donisthorpe, 1932c: 444, suggest that Camponotus irritans may be the worker of Camponotus festinus diligens.]